 |
STANDARD 2: ASSESSMENT
SYSTEM AND UNIT EVALUATION
The unit has as assessment system that
collects and analyzes data on applicant qualification, candidate and
graduate performance, and unit operations to evaluate and improve
the unit and its programs.
(Click here
to view the Institutional report in pdf format.)
|
Assessment System
EXHIBITS |
|
ACCEPTABLE
The unit has developed an assessment
system with its professional community that reflects the
conceptual framework(s) and professional and state standards.
The unit’s system includes a comprehensive and integrated set
of evaluation measures that are used to monitor candidate
performance and manage and improve operations and programs.
Decisions about candidate performance are based on multiple
assessments made at admission into programs, at appropriate
transition points and at program completion. Assessments used to
determine admission, continuation in, and completion of programs
are predictors of candidate success. The unit takes effective
steps to eliminate sources of bias in performance assessments
and works to establish the fairness, accuracy, and consistency
of its assessment procedures. |
TARGET
The unit, with the involvement of its
professional community, is implementing as assessment system
that reflects the conceptual framework(s) and incorporates
candidate proficiencies outlined in professional and state
standards. The unit continuously examines the validity and
utility of the data produced through assessments and makes
modifications to keep abreast of changes in assessment
technology and in professional standards. Decisions about
candidate performance are based on multiple assessments made at
multiple points before program completion. Data show the strong
relationship of performance assessment to candidate success. The
unit conducts thorough studies to establish fairness, accuracy
and consistency of its performance assessment procedures. It
also makes changes in its practices consistent with the results
in these studies. |
Data Collection,
Analysis, and Evaluation
EXHIBITS |
|
ACCEPTABLE
The unit maintains an assessment system
that provides regular and comprehensive information on applicant
qualifications, candidate proficiencies, competence of
graduates, unit operations, and program quality. Using multiple
assessments from internal and external sources, the unit
collects data from applicants, candidates, recent gradates,
faculty, and other members of the professional community. These
data are regularly and systematically compiled, summarized, and
analyzed to improve candidate performance, program quality, and
unit operations. The unit maintains its assessment system
through the use of information technologies. |
TARGET
The unit is implementing its assessment
system and providing regular and comprehensive data on program
quality, unit operations, and candidate performance at each
stage of a program, including first years of practice. Data from
candidates, graduates, faculty, and other members of the
professional community are based on multiple assessments from
both internal and external sources. Data are regularly and
systemically collected, complied, summarized, analyzed, and
reported publicly for the purpose of improving candidate
performance, program quality, and unit operations. The unit is
developing and testing different information technologies to
improve its assessment system. |
|
Use of Data for
Program Improvement
EXHIBITS |
|
ACCEPTABLE
The unit regularly and systemically uses
data, including candidate and graduate performance information,
to evaluate the efficacy of its courses, programs, and clinical
experiences. The unit analyzes program evaluation and
performance assessment data to initiate changes where indicated.
Candidate and faculty assessment data are regularly shared with
candidates and faculty respectively to help them reflect on
their performance and improve on it.
|
TARGET
The unit has fully developed evaluations
and continuously searches for stronger relationships in the
evaluation, revising both the underlying data systems and
analytic techniques as necessary. The unit not only makes
changes when evaluations indicate, but also systemically studies
the effects any changes to assure that the intended program
strengthening occurs and that there are no adverse consequences.
Candidates and faculty review performance data on their
performance regularly and develop plans for improvement. |
|
 |